If principles-based accounting is superior to rules-based accounting, as professed by so many in the profession, then this proposition ought to apply to other areas as well, including accounting ethics.  The profession could set up accounting ethics as a principles-based system or as a rules-based codification, and which direction the profession chooses will speak volumes [...]

In previous essays we have discussed the context in which Enron found itself during the 1990s, an environment friendly to managers who chose aggressive accounting maneuvers; we have described the crimes themselves; we have looked at the gargantuan transformation of the auditing profession; and we have examined what Arthur Andersen did not do in its [...]

Arthur Andersen was not a hapless bystander when Enron’s managers committed their accounting frauds, nor was it a duped auditor, nor an innocent victim of the media.  Perhaps it was a scapegoat as all the large firms have engaged in audits of less than stellar quality, but that does not excuse its poor performance at [...]

We already have discussed the context for Enron’s crimes by describing the Roaring Nineties as a period of accounting exaggeration and worse.  We then referenced the first SEC filing that confessed some of the crimes by Enron’s managers.  In this and the next essay, we turn our attention to the auditor Arthur Andersen; specifically, we [...]

Many of us if asked to recall the details of a past crime or injustice would be hard pressed to do so.  Similarly, today’s young accountants all have heard about Enron as example of financial reporting failure.  However, as the years pass, the details of this accounting crime also have faded.  The tenth anniversary is [...]